基于GCM_CB模型的土壤重金属污染评价
更新时间：2014-07-17 16:27
来源：环境工程学报
作者:
阅读：1909
| 中文摘要: |
| 灰色聚类法已经运用于土壤重金属污染评价中,然而此法在确定聚类权重时仅考虑重金属浓度,忽略了衡量重金属毒性强弱的重要指标生物毒性指数。为了更客观和准确地反映土壤重金属的污染程度,将生物毒性指数引入到聚类指标权重中,构建GCMCB(grey clustering method_concentration and biotoxicity)土壤重金属污染评价模型。通过对华东某地区的10个区域土壤重金属污染进行分析评价,并与常用评价方法对比研究,表明:其多数样点的评价结果基本一致,但针对样品4和样品9中的元素Hg,因其强毒性,使得评价等级由I级定为II级,从而提高了评价方法的灵敏度,更加符合该区域的实际土壤污染情况。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Grey clustering method has been applied to the evaluation of soil heavy metal pollution.However,in the process of drawing clustering weights,this method only considers the heavy metal concentration and ignors its biotoxicity index which is an important indicator to measure the toxicity intensity of the heavy metal.In order to reflect the pollution levels of soil heavy metal more objectively and accurately,biotoxicity index was introduced into the clustering weights to build the GCM CB soil heavy metal pollution evaluation model.Soil heavy metal data of 10 areas in eastern China were estimated,appraised and compared with other results evaluated by common evaluation methods.The conclusion is that the majority results are basically same except for sample 4 and sample 9.Their pollution level is changed from level I to level II for the element Hg with high toxicity,which improves the sensitivity of the evaluation method and makes it more coincided with the actual soil contamination of the area. |
声明：转载此文是出于传递更多信息之目的。若有来源标注错误或侵犯了您的合法权益，请作者持权属证明与本网联系，我们将及时更正、删除，谢谢。
使用微信“扫一扫”功能添加“谷腾环保网”
如果需要了解更加详细的内容，请点击下载 
201407171627500610.zip
下载该附件请登录，如果还不是本网会员，请先注册
